learning · Indonesian — bilingual opening

Food Poisoning from Free Nutritious Meals Reached 20,000 Cases in 2025

The mass poisoning cases linked to Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meals program reveal how hurried, centralized implementation and weak food-safety governance turned a welfare initiative into a public-health risk.

Keracunan massal pada MBG: Akibat aturan keamanan pangan hanya formalitas?
The Conversation Indonesia · By Arif Sujagat; Grace Wangge; Henry Surendra · 25 March 2026 · read the original in Indonesian →

● Keracunan akibat Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) tembus 20 ribu kasus sepanjang 2025.

● Poisoning from Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) surpassed 20,000 cases over the course of 2025.

● Sekitar 11 ribu dapur MBG belum tersertifikasi dan mengabaikan standar keamanan pangan.

● Around 11,000 MBG kitchens remain uncertified and are neglecting food-safety standards.

● The situation has been worsened by the centralized and hurried implementation of MBG in pursuit of government targets.

Poisoning from Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) surpassed 20,000 cases over the course of 2025. Even into early 2026, poisoning cases continued to number in the thousands.

Our analysis, using report data from health facilities in Indonesia, found 177 extraordinary events (KLB) caused by MBG-related poisoning in 127 regencies/cities and 33 provinces over the past year.

From our data analysis and interviews, it emerged that the principal cause of the mass poisonings was the weak application of food-safety standards, the result of MBG’s centralized and rushed implementation.

Weak Food-Safety StandardsStandar keamanan pangan lemah

Our interviews with 162 health surveillance officers found various violations of basic food-safety principles in MBG implementation. Among them: MBG kitchen staff, known as Nutrition Fulfillment Implementation Units (SPPG), cooked without complete personal protective equipment, practiced poor handwashing, and stored raw food ingredients at improper temperatures.

Cooked MBG meals were also left at room temperature for seven to eight hours before being consumed. This duration far exceeds the safe four-hour food-storage limit recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Ideally, cooked food that is not consumed immediately should be stored in a refrigerator at a maximum temperature of 5°C (Celsius).

Storing food beyond the safe time limit increases the risk of bacterial growth, including E. coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Staphylococcus. This array of dangerous bacteria was shown to have caused most MBG poisoning cases, based on laboratory testing conducted by the Ministry of Health.

The cleanliness of MBG kitchens and tableware was also extremely poor. Food containers, for example, were often dried with wiping cloths; fruit was not washed by the proper method; kitchen utensils were merely wiped down without sterilization; and sanitation in the kitchen environment was poor.

Such conditions risk becoming another gateway for bacterial growth, including bacteria carried by flies.

Apart from bacterial contamination, a minority of poisoning cases were caused by contamination with the chemical nitrite. This substance is used to control bacteria and as a food preservative, as in the case of the mass poisoning of 1,315 students in West Bandung, West Java.

Tens of Thousands of MBG Kitchens UncertifiedBelasan ribu dapur MBG tak tersertifikasi

Weak early-detection and incident-response systems in the field have compounded the risk of mass poisoning from MBG. We found that this occurred because local health offices were not optimally involved in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of the project.

MBG implementation has so far been highly centralized. The National Nutrition Agency (BGN), formed only about four months before the program was launched, was assigned to coordinate MBG implementation nationally through the SPPG.

Yet BGN only began requiring every MBG kitchen to hold a hygiene and sanitation feasibility certificate (SLHS) in September 2025, nine months after thousands of victims had already fallen ill as a result of the Free Nutritious Meals rollout.

Applying SLHS can guarantee the quality of food and environmental safety. However, we found that only 198 MBG kitchen units had SLHS out of a total of 11,592 units in operation. In other words, around 98 percent of MBG kitchens still lacked this certification and continued operating.

In addition to SLHS, BGN’s guidelines recommend that MBG kitchens meet the international standard for food-safety management systems, known as hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP). Yet BGN reported that only 26 MBG kitchen units met HACCP standards.

According to BGN, every SPPG is required to have a dedicated officer who supervises the application of daily food-safety standards, such as cooking methods and food storage.

This task appears to be placed solely on nutrition officers, of whom there is only one in each MBG kitchen. As a result, their workload is grossly unbalanced. On the other hand, nutritionists have the primary obligation of ensuring that the MBG menu meets nutritional standards every day.

Rushed Production Neglects SafetyProduksi kejar tayang abaikan keamanan

Under the technical guidelines for MBG management, each MBG kitchen unit is required to produce 3,000 meal portions for 15 to 20 schools.

In reality, many MBG kitchens produce more than 3,500 portions per day in order to pursue the government’s target of 82.9 million beneficiaries by the end of 2025. On top of that, MBG kitchens must provide food for posyandu, or integrated health-service posts, every month.

Without a strict food-safety management system, this minimally evaluated race to meet production targets risks adding to the workload of MBG kitchen staff and neglecting food-safety standards. The cooking process, for instance, can continue late into the night.

Food Safety Is Not NegotiableKeamanan pangan tak bisa ditawar

To prevent food-poisoning cases, every MBG kitchen must apply HACCP and the WHO’s five keys to safer food.

One requirement is monitoring temperature control points so that food is protected from the risk of microbial contamination. For example, if freshly cooked food is to be stored in a refrigerator, it must pass through two cooling stages to prevent bacterial growth.

First, lower the temperature from 60°C to 20°C within a maximum of two hours. Second, continue cooling it to 4°C within two to four hours.

All temperature measurements must use calibrated thermometers and be documented in a temperature logbook.

In addition to temperature control points, raw and cooked ingredients must be strictly separated. Food that has passed the safe time limit for consumption must be discarded and must not be served.

It must also be ensured that every MBG kitchen worker applies hygiene standards at every stage of MBG management, from ingredient preparation through the distribution process for school students.

The application of these technical food-safety standards will not be effective without clear governance, routine supervision by local health professionals, and periodic independent audits.

The government also needs to invest in essential infrastructure, such as routine thermometer calibration, adequate refrigerators and freezers, sterilization equipment, access to clean water, and kitchen facilities that meet the standards for large-scale food management.

Implementation must be carried out gradually, using food-safety rules and practices that are tightly supervised and involve multiple sectors.

Involve health offices, especially community health centers (puskesmas), as well as schools, education offices, and the public in routine MBG oversight. This includes a school-based disease-monitoring system to accelerate the response to extraordinary events.

Another important step is to conduct operational research to identify barriers to implementation, as well as a cost-benefit analysis of MBG, in order to evaluate the program’s long-term sustainability.

Y done · S save · G great · B bad · N not for me