translated from Japanese

第7部 廃炉の最終形❹ 不透明さ、参入の壁 精緻な工程表求める声

The absence of a clearly defined end state and detailed roadmap for decommissioning Fukushima Daiichi is making it harder for local firms to plan, invest, and turn decommissioning into a sustained regional industry.

Fukushima Minpo · 3 May 2026 · read the original in Japanese →

“From the local point of view, it looks like an immense undertaking beyond anyone’s capacity to handle.” A construction contractor in Futaba County speaks with a trace of irony about the still undefined work of decommissioning Tokyo Electric Power Company’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The present failure to specify the final form, or end state, has bred ambiguity around the process leading to completion of decommissioning and around the substance of the work itself. As a result, the contractor says, firms cannot tell whether their own technologies can be put to use, leading some businesses to hesitate before entering the field.

In decommissioning, where the work ranges widely, opportunities for local businesses to take part are gradually increasing, from the construction of seawalls to the operation of volume-reduction treatment facilities and the dismantling of exhaust stacks. At the same time, much of the work requires advanced technology, and some tasks demand particular qualifications and experience. When a new firm with little connection to prime contractors and little on-site experience tries to enter the field, it is not easy to build the necessary organization in a short period. The contractor reveals that “there have also been cases in which companies in Nakadori that had been considering participation gave up.”

As key operations such as the removal of molten nuclear fuel, or debris, move into full swing, the contractor voices a candid appeal to the national government and TEPCO: “We want them to show, clearly and concretely, what path there is for local companies to make use of their strengths.”

It has long been pointed out that the lack of specificity about the end state and the steps required to reach it “is affecting the industrialization of decommissioning.” If the precise contents of work orders are hard to see, then it becomes difficult for companies to enter the field through careful planning, from securing the necessary personnel and building organizations to developing technologies and establishing production systems.

As a measure to spell out in greater detail the roadmap that serves as the guide for decommissioning, the national government and TEPCO have drawn up a medium- to long-term implementation plan and update it every year. The work planned for the coming three years is described on a year-by-year basis. By contrast, while the plan includes outlines of construction work and facilities roughly four to twelve years ahead, it gives no clear timing, and from the thirteenth year onward the opacity deepens. From the standpoint of grasping the progress of the work as well, calls are growing for the authorities to consolidate, at least once, not only the end state but also information now coming to light, such as the properties of the debris, and to create a more precise roadmap.

Toshi Yanagihara, a visiting professor at the University of Fukui and a member of the Waste Management Subcommittee of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, emphasizes that industrial clustering is important for solving decommissioning problems that electric power companies cannot address on their own. Citing the example of Fukui Prefecture, where government and businesses are working together and moves are advancing toward turning the recycling of waste generated by decommissioning into a business, he points to the need to improve the current situation, in which processes and interim goals remain unclear, in order to increase the number of participating companies and partnerships.

In recent years TEPCO has been trying various approaches to encourage local companies to take part, such as presenting near-term construction plans. It has created opportunities, through prime contractors and others, to explain the outlook for orders for equipment inspections, construction work, and related tasks, and this is said to have led to broad participation.

Within Futaba County, companies are becoming more active, including by working to acquire the qualifications needed to engage in the work. Reiko Hachisuka, chair of the Okuma Town Society of Commerce and Industry, says of the long-term decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi, “The highest priority is to advance the work safely and steadily.” As a foundation for that, she says, it is important for local companies to cultivate people who can be involved over the long term and gain experience, and to create an environment in which businesses can be passed on to the generations of children and grandchildren. She called on the national government and others “not to neglect the effort to keep communicating locally about what kinds of jobs there are, and about the details and outlook for the work, so that more young people will become involved.” (Honorifics omitted in the text.)

Y done · S save · G great · B bad · N not for me